Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB88

Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
2/21/20  
Refer
3/9/20  

Caption

Provides for evaluations of attorney advertisements to be subject to the Public Records Law. (8/1/20)

Impact

If enacted, SB 88 will significantly alter the handling of attorney advertising evaluations within Louisiana. By designating these evaluations as public records, the bill promotes a culture of transparency, compelling the LSBA to disclose information that was previously deemed proprietary. This change aims to protect consumer rights by enabling potential clients to make informed decisions based on available evaluations, potentially impacting the practices and strategies lawyers use in their marketing efforts.

Summary

Senate Bill 88, introduced by Senator Hewitt, mandates that evaluations of attorney advertisements conducted by the Louisiana State Bar Association (LSBA) be classified as public records. This measure aims to enhance transparency regarding how attorneys market their services, ensuring that these evaluations can be inspected under the Public Records Law. The intent of this legislation is to provide the public with access to information that can influence their choices when selecting legal representation, thereby fostering an environment of accountability within the legal profession.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 88 has been largely positive among supporters who advocate for increased consumer protection and transparency within the legal services sector. Proponents argue that making such evaluations public will help safeguard clients from misleading or unethical advertising practices by attorneys. However, there are concerns from some legal professionals regarding the implications of this transparency, fearing that it could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the evaluation criteria, ultimately affecting their reputations negatively.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 88 focus on the balance between transparency and the protection of proprietary information. Critics argue that some evaluation processes might require confidentiality to protect sensitive data or proprietary evaluation methods. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for a right of action against the LSBA if they fail to comply with the disclosure requirements, which raises concerns about potential legal liabilities and the implications for the LSBA's operational dynamics. Such discussions highlight the challenges of enforcing transparency while maintaining the integrity of the attorney advertising evaluation process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.