Louisiana Senate Bill SR70

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/31/20
• Passed: 6/1/20

Caption

Request the governor to issue an executive order requiring certain persons to wear a face covering in public under certain conditions and authorizing businesses to deny admittance to persons without face coverings.

Impact

Should the governor implement this order, SR70 would significantly bolster public health measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to reduce transmission risk by ensuring mask usage in crowded spaces. This action aligns with recommendations from health authorities such as the Louisiana Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, reflecting an urgency to protect both citizens' health and the functioning of public facilities. The resolution implicitly recognizes the ongoing challenges posed by the pandemic and acts as a proactive measure to safeguard public well-being.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 70 (SR70) urges the Louisiana governor to issue an executive order that mandates individuals medically able to tolerate a face covering to do so in public settings where social distancing is challenging. This resolution highlights the necessity of wearing masks, especially indoors or outdoors where a distance of approximately six feet from others cannot be maintained. It also grants business operators the authority to require masks, including the right to deny entry to individuals not complying with the mask requirement, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR70 leans towards support for public health initiatives, though it may encounter mixed reactions from the community. Advocates see this as a necessary and responsible action to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19. However, dissenting opinions may arise from individuals or groups opposed to mandates regarding personal health choices, particularly concerning individual freedoms and rights. The balance between public health safety and personal liberties remains a point of contention in discussions about mask mandates.

Contention

Notably, there are potential conflicts regarding the enforcement of such mask mandates. While the resolution aims to protect public health, it also raises questions about how businesses will implement and manage compliance. Challenges may arise related to the discretion given to business operators in denying entry, which could lead to disputes and discomfort among patrons. Criticism may emerge from those who argue that such mandates infringe upon personal freedoms or create an environment of exclusion for those unable to wear face coverings for medical reasons.