Louisiana House Bill HB155

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/21
• Refer: 3/19/21
• Refer: 4/12/21

Caption

Provides appropriation for the Board of Regents for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to purchase certain chest compression devices (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

By providing these essential devices to key educational institutions, HB 155 is expected to significantly improve emergency preparedness on college campuses. This legislative action reflects a commitment to the health and safety of students and staff, ensuring that life-saving equipment is readily available during athletic events and other gatherings where the likelihood of medical emergencies may be heightened. The strategic placement of these devices aims to reduce response times in critical situations, potentially saving lives.

Summary

House Bill 155 aims to appropriate $220,000 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2021-2022 to the Board of Regents for the purchase of eleven chest compression devices intended for use at various post-secondary education institutions throughout Louisiana. These devices are designed to assist in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts during instances of cardiac arrest, thereby enhancing the emergency response capabilities at these institutions. The bill outlines the requirement for each selected institution to maintain the devices in their athletic training offices and to transport them to designated 'home games' and other events as necessary.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 155 has been generally positive, with supporters highlighting the importance of being proactive in health and safety measures on campuses. Members of the legislature have expressed that providing such resources is a necessary investment in student safety and welfare. There are, however, always concerns about budgeting and appropriations, particularly in regard to how such funding might affect other areas of state health and education budgets.

Contention

While there is support for the bill, potential contention may arise around budget allocations and priorities. Critics could raise concerns regarding the $220,000 appropriation, questioning whether these funds could be better utilized elsewhere. Additionally, discussions might surface regarding the responsibilities of institutions in maintaining and effectively utilizing the devices, as well as ensuring that staff are adequately trained in their operation. Overall, the bill represents an important step towards enhancing safety mechanisms in educational settings but may require ongoing dialogue on funding and implementation.