Provides for civil liability for the intentional dissemination of personally identifiable information
Impact
By enacting HB 21, the state law will provide stronger legal remedies for victims of harassment and intimidation exercised through the misuse of personal information. This bill could lead to significant changes in how personal data is handled, potentially discouraging individuals from publishing or sharing sensitive information about others without consent, thereby enhancing the overall safety and privacy of citizens. It aims to empower individuals in safeguarding their personal information from malicious disclosure while providing an avenue for legal recourse.
Summary
House Bill 21 aims to establish civil liability for individuals who intentionally disseminate another person's personally identifiable information (PII), with the intent to intimidate, abuse, threaten, or harass. The bill specifically outlines that individuals can be held civilly liable if their actions result in the victim experiencing reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. This law would introduce important definitions regarding what constitutes dissemination, household members, and the types of information considered to be PII, effectively enhancing protections against data breaches and online threats.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among privacy advocates and individuals concerned about data misuse and online harassment. However, there may be concerns from those who worry about the implications this legislation could have on free speech or legitimate disclosures, particularly in scenarios concerning journalistic inquiries or whistleblowing. The bill's focus on personal safety and accountability in the digital age resonates with many, yet it calls for a careful balance to avoid unintended consequences.
Contention
Despite the positive reception, debates may arise regarding the definitions provided in the bill, especially concerning what constitutes 'intention' behind disseminating PII. Critics might argue that the bill could be misused to stifle dissent or restrict open discussions online. The challenge lies in ensuring that the bill effectively protects against real threats without infringing upon the freedoms of expression and transparency, particularly in an age where information is rapidly shared across various platforms.
Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study provisions of law on civil liability for intentional dissemination of personally identifiable information
Enacting the civil liability for doxing act to prohibit intentionally publishing another person's personally identifiable information without the consent of the person whose information is published under certain circumstances and authorize a civil action for violations of the act to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief.
An Act to Protect Individuals from the Threatened Unauthorized Dissemination of Certain Private Images, Including Artificially Generated Private Images