Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB276

Introduced
3/30/21  
Introduced
3/30/21  
Refer
3/30/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Engrossed
5/24/21  
Engrossed
5/24/21  
Refer
5/25/21  

Caption

Provides for changes in the expenditure limit calculation (EG SEE FISC NOTE EX See Note)

Impact

By establishing a more streamlined calculation for the expenditure limit, HB 276 impacts the financial governance of Louisiana significantly. It is designed to ensure that future spending remains aligned with state economic conditions while preventing excessive growth in state expenses. The bill also stipulates that documentation is required for any changes to the methodology used in preceding calculations, thereby aiming to enhance accountability and transparency in fiscal management. This legislative change complements existing budgetary procedures by synchronizing the submission timeline of the expenditure limit with the executive budget proposals.

Summary

House Bill 276 aims to reform the calculation of the state's expenditure limit by changing its base to current year appropriations and limiting its growth to a maximum of five percent. The bill proposes a new method for determining the growth factor, which includes variables such as personal income, gross domestic product, population changes, and consumer price index adjustments over the previous three years. This shift seeks to create a more consistent approach to managing state expenditures and budget planning, giving lawmakers clearer guidelines based on recent economic performance.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 276 appears to be cautiously positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility and reactive governance. Supporters argued that the bill would foster a conducive budgetary environment, promoting economic stability. However, there are concerns regarding the potential for limiting state funding for critical programs, as capping growth might restrict necessary financial resources amidst changing economic conditions. The debate has underscored differing opinions on maintaining flexibility versus enforcing fiscal restraint.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 276 include worries from certain legislators about the risks associated with constraining future budgetary flexibility. Critics express concerns that a rigid spending limit could hinder the ability to respond effectively to economic downturns or emergencies, particularly as state revenue can fluctuate significantly. Furthermore, the specific exemption of COVID-19 related federal funds from the expenditure limit calculation has elicited discussions on the appropriateness of this exclusion, as stakeholders consider the broader implications for fiscal health and investment in state programs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1523

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ SB1018

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ SB1042

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ SB1636

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2148

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ HB2688

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ HB2507

School districts; expenditure limitation

CA SB468

Taxation: tax expenditures: California Tax Expenditure Review Board.