Louisiana House Bill HB320

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/21
• Refer: 3/30/21
• Refer: 4/12/21

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the Department of Transportation and Development in the combined suit captioned Corey O. Banks v. Crescent City Connection and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

Impact

If enacted, HB 320 will directly impact the budgeting protocols within the state treasury by earmarking funds specifically for legal judgments against state departments. This appropriation signifies the legislature's intent to ensure that financial responsibilities stemming from legal actions are met promptly, thereby maintaining the state’s credibility in legal matters. The act effectively prioritizes the payment of court-ordered judgments, which is crucial for the effective management of public funds.

Summary

House Bill 320, introduced by Representative Davis, is aimed at appropriating $13,000 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2020-2021. This funding is designated for the payment of a consent judgment in the case 'Corey O. Banks vs. Crescent City Connection and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development'. The judgment was agreed upon on October 25, 2018, indicating a resolution to disputes involving the Department of Transportation, the Crescent City Connection, and the City of New Orleans. This bill formalizes the state's commitment to fulfilling its financial obligations regarding the judgment.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding HB 320 appears to be largely supportive, as it addresses an obligation to settle a court judgment. Lawmakers involved in the discussions are likely motivated by a desire to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the state adheres to judicial determinations. Stakeholders may view the bill favorably given that it reflects accountability and responsibility in dealing with legal matters.

Contention

While HB 320 seems straightforward, its passage may not be without contention, particularly regarding the appropriation of funds and the implications for future budgets. Questions may arise concerning the broader implications of routinely allocating state funds for legal judgments, which could inform discussions on state financial management and resource allocation in the future. Additionally, some legislators may express concern over ensuring that such appropriations do not set precedents for future financial obligations.