Louisiana House Bill HB341

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/21
• Refer: 4/22/21
• Report Pass: 5/6/21
• Engrossed: 5/17/21
• Refer: 5/18/21
• Report Pass: 6/3/21
• Enrolled: 6/9/21
• Chaptered: 6/14/21
• Passed: 6/14/21

Caption

Provides relative to the parcel fee imposed within the Upper Audubon Security District in Orleans Parish (EN +$6,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 341 is expected to strengthen the financial structure of the Upper Audubon Security District by allowing for a more predictable and substantial revenue stream through parcel fees. It removes earlier restrictions on the district's ability to collect these fees, potentially leading to improved security and community services. Importantly, the implementation of these fees would only occur after a majority of registered voters in the district approve it through an election, ensuring local democratic engagement in the decision-making process.

Summary

House Bill 341 amends existing legislation related to the Upper Audubon Security District in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. Its primary focus is on the parcel fee imposed within the district, increasing the allowable fee per parcel to a maximum of seven hundred dollars annually. The bill also adjusts provisions regarding the fees for certain property owners who qualify for a special assessment level under Louisiana law. This change aims to clarify the authority of the district to impose such fees, enhancing their financial resources for community security and other services.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 341 appears supportive among those who recognize the importance of funding for community safety and services. Proponents assert that the additional funds will enable better security measures and enhanced public services within the district. Conversely, some may express concern about the financial burden on property owners, particularly those on fixed incomes, who may find the increased fees challenging to manage.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between enhancing district security through increased fees and the financial impact on residents. Critics may argue that while improving security is essential, the added cost for home and property owners could disproportionately affect lower-income families. Furthermore, the requirement for voter approval to implement the fee may lead to debates on local governance and the role of residents in financial decisions affecting their community.