Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB360

Introduced
3/31/21  
Introduced
3/31/21  
Refer
3/31/21  
Refer
3/31/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/19/21  
Engrossed
4/26/21  
Engrossed
4/26/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Report Pass
5/18/21  

Caption

Provides relative to the registration of short-term rental dwellings with the office of state fire marshal (EG1 INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 360 is expected to impact state laws regarding the regulation of short-term rentals significantly. It requires owners to submit registration forms electronically and ensures that only those compliant with the registration requirements can operate such rental units legally. This bill also specifies penalties for non-compliance and how collected fees are to be managed, thereby adding a layer of oversight over the burgeoning short-term rental market.

Summary

House Bill 360 aims to regulate short-term rental dwelling units by establishing a registration process with the office of the state fire marshal. The bill defines key terms such as 'short-term rental dwelling unit,' 'booking transaction,' and 'owner,' providing clarity around the parameters of this new regulatory framework. It mandates that owners must register their rental units before using any online platform for booking transactions, thus ensuring compliance with state safety standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 360 appears largely supportive from proponents who argue that it enhances safety for guests and promotes lawful operations among rental owners. However, there are concerns raised by some stakeholders about the potential impact on the rental market, particularly regarding the administrative burden of compliance and the possibility of stifling this growing sector in the local economy.

Contention

The bill does face some contention, particularly around the fees associated with registration and the penalties imposed for violations. While the proposed fees are relatively low, the imposition of civil penalties for non-compliance may create a point of concern among rental owners who are already navigating a competitive market. Additionally, the bill emphasizes that it should not allow for inspections of private residences, which is a critical point for property owners who value their privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.