Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB392

Introduced
4/1/21  
Introduced
4/1/21  
Refer
4/1/21  
Refer
4/1/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
5/6/21  
Report Pass
5/6/21  
Engrossed
5/17/21  
Engrossed
5/17/21  
Refer
5/18/21  
Report Pass
5/25/21  
Enrolled
6/3/21  
Enrolled
6/3/21  
Chaptered
6/11/21  
Chaptered
6/11/21  
Passed
6/11/21  

Caption

Provides relative to the criminal court fund in DeSoto Parish (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 392 signifies a legislative shift toward enabling local governing authorities in DeSoto and Red River Parishes to access funds that may alleviate financial pressures faced by the judiciary offices within these jurisdictions. This change could potentially improve the efficacy of local legal proceedings by ensuring that the necessary administrative and operational expenses are met, thereby enhancing the judicial processes and administration in these areas.

Summary

House Bill 392 aims to amend the applicable law concerning the Criminal Court Fund in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana. It allows the governing authority of DeSoto Parish, as well as Red River Parish, to utilize the Criminal Court Fund for covering expenses related to the offices of the judge and the district attorney, which includes the salaries of employees such as assistant district attorneys. Notably, the bill specifies that it does not permit the payment of judges' salaries from this fund, thereby maintaining foundational salary structures while allowing flexibility for operational expenses.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 392 appears to be positive, reflecting a consensus on the necessity for local funding solutions to support judicial operations. With unanimous support in the voting outcome – a 35 to 0 vote in favor – it indicates a collaborative effort among legislators to bolster local governance and judicial effectiveness. The absence of opposing votes suggests a lack of significant contention within the legislative discussion regarding the bill's objectives.

Contention

While HB 392 seems to achieve broad support, potential areas of contention could arise in future applications or interpretations of how the funds are allocated. The exclusion of judges' salaries could lead to scrutiny over the adequacy of resources provided for judicial functions. Additionally, how these funds are managed by local governing authorities might prompt discussions on accountability and best practices, balancing the need for financial support with responsible governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.