Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB44

Introduced
3/2/21  
Refer
3/2/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
5/3/21  
Report Pass
5/3/21  
Engrossed
5/12/21  
Engrossed
5/12/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Report Pass
6/2/21  
Report Pass
6/2/21  
Enrolled
6/8/21  
Chaptered
6/22/21  
Chaptered
6/22/21  

Caption

Provides for an additional exception when hauling construction aggregates

Impact

The enactment of HB 44 is expected to have implications for businesses involved in the construction industry, particularly those that deal with the transportation and use of dirt in construction projects. By explicitly defining dirt as a part of construction aggregates, the bill may streamline regulations regarding how this material is handled, making it easier for businesses to comply with state laws. This change could lead to increased efficiency in the sourcing and hauling of construction materials, as well as potentially reducing regulatory burdens associated with transporting dirt.

Summary

House Bill 44 proposes a significant change to the legal definition of 'construction aggregates' within Louisiana state law. Specifically, the bill expands this definition to include dirt as a material classified under construction aggregates. This legal adjustment aims to clarify what constitutes construction aggregates for regulatory purposes and potentially influence the management and transportation of such materials in construction projects across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 44 appears to be largely positive, particularly among stakeholders in the construction industry. Supporters argue that the bill will help clarify existing laws and facilitate more straightforward management of construction materials, promoting better compliance and operational efficiency. There is a sense of agreement that including dirt in the definition of construction aggregates is a necessary update to reflect current practices in the industry.

Contention

While the discussions around HB 44 were not marked by significant contention, some legislative debates may have revolved around the implications of defining additional materials under construction regulations. Concerns could arise regarding how this expansion might complicate existing definitions and whether additional regulatory measures might be necessary as a result. However, the universal approval during voting, with no recorded opposition, indicates a strong consensus in support of the measure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.