Louisiana House Bill HCR90

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/21
• Refer: 5/18/21
• Report Pass: 5/26/21
• Engrossed: 6/1/21
• Report Pass: 6/2/21
• Passed: 6/10/21

Caption

Provides relative to redistricting principles and criteria

Impact

The impact of HCR90 revolves around how redistricting plans will be formulated and reviewed moving forward. By ensuring that plans comply with constitutional mandates (such as the Equal Protection Clause), the resolution helps maintain checks and balances in the electoral process. With strict rules regarding population deviations and the preservation of geographic integrity, the resolution aims to prevent gerrymandering practices that can undermine electoral fairness and representation.

Summary

HCR90 is a Concurrent Resolution adopted by the Louisiana Legislature that establishes minimum criteria for redistricting plans. This resolution articulates necessary criteria focusing on adherence to federal and state laws which include equal population distribution, contiguity of districts, and maintaining the integrity of communities of interest. By codifying these principles, HCR90 seeks to promote fair and equitable representation in congressional and state legislative districts following the decennial census.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HCR90 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators who champion the principles of equitable representation and adherence to constitutional norms. The resolution received overwhelming approval in the Senate with a vote of 35 to 1, indicating a rare consensus across party lines on the importance of meaningful and fair legislative representation in Louisiana.

Contention

While HCR90 has garnered largely favorable views, discussions surrounding redistricting often spark contention regarding the extent to which such criteria might impact local political dynamics. Specific debates may focus on how population equality parameters could shift representation in more populous areas compared to rural districts, raising concerns about the effective representation of diverse communities. Furthermore, the preservation of traditional district alignments could be contested if it conflicts with the need to enhance representation for underrepresented populations.