Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the case entitled Tommy Herring v. Vance McAlister, et al.
Impact
The passage of HB 114 serves as a directive to allocate funds specifically for a finalized legal settlement. This has implications for state budget management, reflecting a legal obligation that the state must fulfill. Such financial appropriations are essential for maintaining government responsibilities and ensuring that legal matters are settled expediently to prevent further financial repercussions or interest accrual.
Summary
House Bill 114 is an act that appropriates $2,500 from the State General Fund for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to satisfy a consent judgment involving the state of Louisiana. This judgment is specifically for the case 'Tommy Herring v. Vance McAlister et al.', which concerns legal claims against the state through the Department of Transportation and Development. The bill establishes the payment terms and clarifies conditions under which the payment is to be made.
Sentiment
There seems to be a neutral sentiment surrounding this bill, typical for legislation focused on financial matters related to court judgments. The discussions around it likely center on procedural aspects rather than ideological divides, seeing as its purpose is to authorize a necessary payment rather than to introduce new policies or reforms.
Contention
While HB 114 itself may not have generated significant controversy, it underscores the ongoing fiscal challenges that the state faces in managing legal liabilities. However, some legislators might raise concerns regarding the financial impact of various legal judgments on the state’s budget and the priorities concerning fund allocations. The bill’s straightforward nature means that most discussions are likely procedural rather than contentious.
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Hudson Glass of DeRidder, LLC et al. v. State of Louisiana et al.