Louisiana House Bill HB115

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/22
• Refer: 2/21/22
• Refer: 3/14/22

Caption

Provides relative to P.O.S.T. certification and additional pay for House and Senate sergeants-at-arms (OR +$33,600 GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 115 is likely to enhance the financial support provided to sergeants-at-arms, improving their compensation structure. By linking extra pay to P.O.S.T. certification and a minimum service requirement, the bill aims to ensure that those in these roles are adequately recognized and rewarded for their training and contribution to the legislative process. This measure could potentially lead to higher recruitment and retention rates for sergeants-at-arms within the state legislature, ensuring that experienced personnel manage security and administrative duties effectively.

Summary

House Bill 115, introduced by Representative Bacala, focuses on providing additional financial compensation for sergeants-at-arms employed by the House of Representatives and the Senate in Louisiana. The bill specifies that full-time sergeants-at-arms who earn a minimum monthly salary of $800 and have completed a P.O.S.T. (Peace Officer Standards and Training) certified training program will receive an extra payment of $500 per month upon completing at least one year of service. This initiative aims to acknowledge the diligence and responsibilities held by these integral positions within the legislative framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 115 appears to be generally positive, particularly from those who advocate for improved pay structures for law enforcement and support staff within legislative roles. Supporters may view this bill as a necessary step toward enhancing the attractiveness of such positions and ensuring that employees feel valued. However, there may also be concerns regarding budget implications, as increased compensation could impact state funding and fiscal allocations.

Contention

A notable point of contention could arise regarding the financial sustainability of providing additional compensation within the state's budget framework. While many may support the idea of fairer pay for essential staff, debates might surface around prioritizing budget allocations and the potential strain this could put on other funding areas. Additionally, some might argue that establishing high pay thresholds could set a precedent for other legislative roles seeking similar compensation adjustments.