Louisiana House Bill HB299

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/14/22
• Report Pass: 4/13/22
• Engrossed: 4/25/22
• Refer: 4/26/22

Caption

Provides for an exception to the Open Meetings Law to allow the receipt of information regarding natural disasters and declared emergencies

Impact

The enactment of HB 299 would have a significant impact on how public bodies handle discussions related to emergencies. By exempting information receipt from open meeting requirements, the bill aims to enable quicker decision-making in assessing and responding to emergencies. This change could enhance the ability of public bodies to coordinate efforts during disasters, which has been increasingly important in recent years given the rise in frequency and severity of natural events. However, this could also raise concerns regarding transparency and public oversight during these crucial meetings.

Summary

House Bill 299, introduced by Representative Amedee, seeks to amend the existing Open Meetings Law in Louisiana by providing an exception for public bodies in cases of natural disasters or declared emergencies. This legislation allows members of these public bodies to receive information concerning preparations for and recovery from such situations without the constraints of the standard open meeting requirements, as long as no voting or formal actions take place during these discussions. The bill is designed to facilitate timely communication and response in critical situations, allowing public bodies to function effectively during emergencies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 299 appeared largely supportive among proponents who argue that the changes are necessary to improve the state's response to emergencies. Supporters contend that removing the need for open meetings in these specific situations alleviates bureaucratic delays and allows for more effective management of disaster-related issues. Conversely, there may be apprehensions from opponents who argue that such exceptions could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, potentially obscuring decision-making processes from public scrutiny.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 299 include the potential risks to public access and accountability. Critics express concerns that enabling discussions without the public present could set a precedent for lack of transparency in government operations, particularly in instances where critical decisions are made outside the public eye. The bill's strict stipulation that no votes or discussion of future actions can occur during these meetings is seen as a measure to mitigate some of these concerns. Nonetheless, it remains a point of debate whether the benefits of expedited communication during emergencies outweigh the need for public involvement and oversight.