Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB36

Introduced
2/1/22  
Refer
2/1/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Engrossed
4/18/22  
Engrossed
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Chaptered
5/25/22  
Chaptered
5/25/22  

Caption

Provides relative to the jurisdictional limits for the City Court of Houma

Impact

The passage of HB 36 is expected to enhance access to justice for individuals involved in lower-stakes civil disputes by allowing these cases to be heard in city courts. This change could alleviate the caseload pressure on district courts, enabling them to focus on more complex or significant cases. By adjusting the jurisdictional limits, the bill aims to improve the efficiency of the judicial process at the local level, potentially shortening the time it takes for justice to be served in these civil matters.

Summary

House Bill 36 seeks to amend and reenact the Code of Civil Procedure Article 4843(D) and (F) concerning city court jurisdiction in Louisiana. The bill specifically addresses the limits of civil jurisdiction for several city courts, including the City Court of Houma and Lafayette, establishing that their jurisdiction will be concurrent with the district court for disputes not exceeding twenty thousand dollars. Furthermore, it raises the jurisdictional limit to thirty thousand dollars for other specified city courts, including Breaux Bridge, Crowley, and Hammond, among others.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding HB 36 appears to be favorable, as the bill received unanimous support during its final passage in the Senate vote, with 33 yeas and no nays. This overwhelming approval suggests a broad consensus among lawmakers regarding the necessity of the amendments proposed in the bill and a shared belief in their potential benefits for the community. Lawmakers seem to focus on the need for reform in local courts to better serve the public's interests in civil legal matters.

Contention

Despite the bill's apparent support, debates on jurisdictional limits can often bring forth underlying tensions regarding access to justice. Some stakeholders could argue about whether raising the limits is sufficient to cover all necessary cases or if it may inadvertently lead to complexities in managing higher volumes of cases within the city courts. Additionally, there may be concerns raised by those in the legal community regarding the adequacy of resources at local courts to handle an increase in caseload effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB121

Provides for the jurisdictional limits for the city courts located in the 15th judicial district. (8/1/24)

LA SB5

Provides for the jurisdictional limit for the City Court of Hammond. (8/1/25)

LA HB29

Provides relative to the jurisdictional limitation of certain city courts

LA HB1181

Provides relative to the jurisdictional limitation of certain city courts

LA HB35

Provides relative to the jurisdictional limits of the City Court of Lake Charles

LA HB14

Increases the civil jurisdictional amount in dispute in the certain city courts

LA SB118

Increases the jurisdictional limits of the Winnfield City Court and Monroe City Court to $30,000 and the limit of the Baton Rouge City Court to $35,000. (8/15/10)

LA SB445

Provides for the jurisdictional limits of city courts. (8/1/24) (EN INCREASE LF RV See Note)

LA HB45

Provides relative to the jurisdictional amount in dispute for the City Court of Sulphur

LA HB66

Provides relative to the jurisdictional amount in dispute for the City Court of Sulphur

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.