Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB478

Introduced
3/3/22  
Introduced
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Engrossed
4/4/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Report Pass
5/17/22  
Report Pass
5/17/22  
Enrolled
6/1/22  
Enrolled
6/1/22  
Chaptered
6/22/22  
Chaptered
6/22/22  
Passed
6/22/22  

Caption

Provides relative to the inspection of records for criminal bail bonds

Impact

The introduction of this bill will directly affect the procedures related to the inspection of records pertaining to criminal bail bonds in the state of Louisiana. By enabling surety agents to receive the required documents, it aims to simplify and expedite the administrative processes that follow criminal cases involving bail. This legislative change is significant as it regulates how and under what circumstances agents can access sensitive information related to a defendant's criminal records.

Summary

House Bill 478 focuses on the disclosure of records in relation to criminal bail bonds. Specifically, it enacts provisions that allow agents for sureties of individuals who are parties to a criminal bail bond to request and receive certain records and certificates. The intent is to streamline the process through which these agents can access necessary documentation, provided they furnish proper documentation, including a power of attorney.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 478 appears to be largely positive, with supporters recognizing the necessity of facilitating access to information for agents of sureties. These stakeholders have expressed approval of the bill's aim to provide clarity and efficiency in handling bail-related documents. However, discussions might also include concerns about the implications of such measures on privacy and the potential for misuse of information, though these aspects are less prominently featured in the available statements.

Contention

While there may not be substantial contention noted in the discussions around HB 478, any legislative measure involving criminal records usually raises questions about privacy and the proper use of such information. As it allows a specific group—agents for sureties—to access certain records, there might be discussions weighing the benefits of transparency against the need for protective measures surrounding sensitive data. The balance between accessibility and confidentiality remains a critical point of consideration in the debates about this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.