Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB70

Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
3/16/22  
Report Pass
3/16/22  
Engrossed
3/22/22  
Engrossed
3/22/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Enrolled
5/12/22  
Enrolled
5/12/22  
Chaptered
5/17/22  
Chaptered
5/17/22  
Passed
5/17/22  

Caption

Designates a certain portion of Interstate Highway 20 in Webster Parish as the "Vietnam Veterans Memorial Highway"

Impact

The passage of HB 70 will directly affect state laws concerning highway signage and naming conventions. As part of this act, the applicable jurisdiction, specifically the Department of Transportation and Development, is tasked with erecting appropriate signs along the designated highway segment. This move aligns with broader state initiatives to create memorials acknowledging the sacrifices of military veterans, thereby reinforcing a sense of respect and gratitude in the community.

Summary

House Bill 70, introduced by Representative McMahen and co-sponsored by Senator Robert Mills and various other representatives, aims to honor Vietnam War veterans by designating a specific portion of Interstate Highway 20 in Webster Parish as the 'Vietnam Veterans Memorial Highway'. This designation serves not only as a tribute to the sacrifices of those who served in the Vietnam War but also reinforces the public recognition of veterans' contributions to the nation. The bill highlights a commitment to honoring military service members through public infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be overwhelmingly positive, reflecting a unifying support for honoring veterans. Legislators from both parties co-sponsored the bill, indicating a collaborative effort to recognize the contributions of Vietnam veterans. There is a collective understanding of the importance of memorializing service members, and the bill’s adoption is seen as a reaffirmation of community values centered around honor and remembrance.

Contention

While HB 70 passed without any recorded opposition, notable points of contention in similar discussions often revolve around the allocation of funds for signage maintenance and potential disagreements on the cultural significance of the memorials. However, in this case, the bill outlines that funding for erecting the signage will come from local or private sources, capping the amount at a maximum of sixteen hundred eighty dollars per sign, thereby mitigating concerns about state expenditures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.