Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB829

Introduced
3/17/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Engrossed
4/19/22  
Engrossed
4/19/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Enrolled
6/6/22  
Enrolled
6/6/22  
Chaptered
6/16/22  
Chaptered
6/16/22  
Passed
6/16/22  

Caption

Provides relative to alcoholic beverage delivery

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact local laws surrounding the sale and delivery of alcoholic beverages. By eliminating the need for additional local permits, it allows for a more straightforward process for businesses wanting to offer delivery services. This could lead to increased competition among retailers, as consumers gain easier access to alcoholic beverages through delivery services. However, there are concerns about the potential for undisciplined sales practices and the control local governments traditionally hold over alcohol sales.

Summary

House Bill 829 aims to amend existing laws regarding the delivery of alcoholic beverages in Louisiana. It focuses on allowing retail dealers such as grocery stores and restaurants to enter into agreements with third-party delivery companies to facilitate the sale and delivery of alcoholic beverages. Additionally, it specifies that local jurisdictions cannot require additional permits for third-party delivery services already holding a valid state permit, streamlining the regulatory framework for alcohol delivery.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 829 appears to be largely positive among business owners and proponents of consumer choice. Supporters argue that it facilitates innovation in the delivery sector and meets modern consumer demands for convenience. Conversely, some stakeholders express apprehension regarding public health and safety, fearing that the ease of delivery could lead to increased underage access to alcohol or irresponsible consumption. This dichotomy signals an ongoing debate about balancing commerce with responsible regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the potential consequences of the bill on community standards and local governance. Critics argue that by removing local control, the bill undermines the ability of municipalities to enforce stricter regulations that align with their specific needs and values. Concerns have also been raised about delivery miles, with different limitations set based on parish populations, which could create disparities in service availability and enforcement challenges across different regions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S2273

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A5213

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ A2809

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ S486

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A3594

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A2793

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB1360

Third-party food delivery.