Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB841

Introduced
3/21/22  
Introduced
3/21/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/18/22  
Refer
5/19/22  
Refer
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/25/22  
Enrolled
6/2/22  
Enrolled
6/2/22  
Chaptered
6/10/22  
Chaptered
6/10/22  
Passed
6/10/22  

Caption

Provides relative to the disclosure of personal information of certain persons

Impact

The enactment of this bill has implications for state laws concerning public records access. It creates a mechanism for judges to maintain confidentiality regarding their domiciliary addresses while still allowing the public to access necessary property records through alternate channels. This balance aims to uphold transparency in government while recognizing the unique safety needs of judicial officials.

Summary

House Bill 841 establishes new provisions regarding the disclosure of personal information, specifically addressing the domiciliary addresses of judges in Louisiana. The bill allows judges of a court of record to request the removal of their names from publicly accessible property assessment rolls. This is aimed at increasing the safety and privacy of judges by limiting public access to their residential addresses, which can help protect them from potential threats associated with their judicial duties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 841 appears to be generally supportive, especially among those advocating for the safety of judges and officials whose work might expose them to public scrutiny or animosity. The legislative discussions reflect an understanding of the challenges faced by judges, making it less contentious than other bills that restrict public records. However, there may be concerns raised by advocacy groups about the broader implications of restricting public access to certain government records.

Contention

While the bill is primarily focused on providing safety for judges, it does raise questions about public access to information that has traditionally been available. Supporters argue that the need for judicial safety outweighs the benefits of full transparency in this case, whereas opponents may express concern that such measures could lead to a slippery slope regarding access to public records. Overall, the main contention lies in finding a proper balance between privacy needs and public interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB2686

Relating To The Disclosure Of Personal Information Of Certain Public Servants.

LA HB2320

Relating To The Disclosure Of Personal Information Of Certain Public Servants.

LA HB116

Provides relative to the disclosure of personnel records of public employees

LA HB1916

Relating To The Disclosure Of Personal Information Associated With Certain Public Servants.

LA SB2379

Relating To The Disclosure Of Personal Information Associated With Certain Public Servants.

LA HB681

Provides relative to access to personal information of district attorneys (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

LA HB617

Provides relative to the protection of personally identifiable information

LA HB294

Requires personal financial disclosure by judges and justices of the peace (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB194

Requires judges to file personal financial disclosure forms as a public record. (gov sig)

LA AB225

Revises provisions concerning the confidentiality of personal information of certain persons. (BDR 20-944)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.