Louisiana House Bill HB891

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/4/22
• Refer: 4/5/22
• Report Pass: 5/2/22
• Engrossed: 5/11/22
• Refer: 5/12/22

Caption

Provides relative to the procurement of internet services and wide area networks services and systems by state agencies (RE SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

By removing the exclusive control over internet services from OTS and OTM, HB 891 promotes deregulation within the state’s procurement process. This could lead to an increased number of vendors offering their services to state agencies, thereby improving service options and potentially lowering costs. However, it does not eliminate the possibility for state agencies to contract with OTS or OTM for these services, which means that the traditional providers still have a role in the new framework. The law takes effect upon the governor's signature, but existing contracts are exempt until renewal or extension.

Summary

House Bill 891 aims to redefine the powers of the Office of Technology Services (OTS) and the Office of Telecommunications Management (OTM) in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill removes the exclusive authority that these offices hold over the provision of internet services and wide area network systems. This change allows state agencies to procure these services from any provider, which is intended to foster competition and potentially enhance the quality and variety of internet services available to state agencies.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 891 appears to be cautiously optimistic, particularly among proponents who favor increased competition in state procurement practices. Supporters argue that this bill is a step toward modernizing state operations and making them more efficient. However, there are concerns regarding oversight and the potential fragmentation of internet service quality. Skeptics worry that removing oversight could lead to inconsistencies in service delivery, depending on the provider selected by individual agencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around how the removal of exclusive authority affects the quality and security of internet services across state agencies. While proponents argue it promotes competition, opponents express fears that a lack of centralized oversight might result in a variety of service standards, which could detrimentally impact public services reliant on reliable internet connectivity. The debate brings into question the balance between fostering competition and ensuring adequate oversight in technology procurement.