Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB85

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/23
• Refer: 1/12/23
• Refer: 5/1/24

Caption

In alternative form of regulation of telecommunications services, further providing for network modernization plans and for additional powers and duties of commission.

Impact

If enacted, SB85 will have substantial implications for state telecommunications regulations. By allowing telecommunications companies to opt-out of providing service in areas served by competitors, it could reduce the obligation of these entities to expand broadband access in underserved areas. The bill also introduces provisions streamlining regulations by permanently waiving certain existing tariff requirements, which may lead to less oversight of pricing and service quality in the telecommunications sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 85 (SB85) aims to amend the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by providing a revised framework for the regulation of telecommunications services, particularly focusing on network modernization plans. The bill proposes significant amendments that allow local exchange telecommunications companies to avoid mandatory broadband service provisions when similar services are available from other providers. This change is intended to give these companies more flexibility regarding their operational obligations and to adapt more quickly to technological developments in telecommunications.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB85 appears to be mixed, with supporters arguing that increased flexibility for telecommunications companies could promote innovation and efficiency within the industry. Conversely, opponents express concerns that weakening broadband availability requirements may exacerbate disparities in access to essential services, particularly in rural or underserved communities. This division indicates a fundamental debate over how regulatory frameworks can balance corporate flexibility with public service obligations.

Contention

Key points of contention include the implications of reducing the duties of telecommunications providers in accepting service requests from customers. Critics worry this could lead to decreased accountability and availability of necessary services, particularly broadband, thereby prolonging service gaps in areas where it is already lacking. Additionally, the question of whether the deregulation measures may hinder consumer protections in the context of pricing and service standards remains a pivotal issue in the discussions around the bill.