Requests the division of administration to study the costs and benefits of insurance coverage for fire protection officers through the office of group benefits (OR NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)
Impact
The potential impact of HR79 on state laws could be significant. If the study finds favorable outcomes regarding the insurance coverage, it may lead to policy changes that enhance the benefits available to fire protection officers. This could also set a precedent for other public safety roles seeking similar benefits, thereby influencing insurance regulations and compensation structures across various state agencies.
Summary
HR79 is a legislative proposal that requests the division of administration to conduct a study on the costs and benefits of providing insurance coverage for fire protection officers through the office of group benefits. This bill aims to assess whether such coverage would be financially viable and beneficial for fire protection personnel, reflecting a growing concern for the welfare of those who serve in critical public safety roles. Ultimately, the goal is to gather data that could inform future decisions on compensation and benefits for these officers.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HR79 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who advocate for better working conditions and benefits for emergency responders. Proponents argue that fire protection officers risk their lives daily, and obtaining necessary insurance coverage would reflect deserved recognition and support from the state. However, some concerns may arise about the financial implications of expanding benefits, which could be contested by those wary of increasing state expenditures.
Contention
While the bill is largely seen as a positive step towards bolstering the insurance security of fire protection officers, there may be some level of contention regarding how the costs of such coverage will be managed and funded. Critics could argue that the costs associated with providing comprehensive insurance could strain budgets, leading to possible cuts in other areas or reliance on increased taxes. Thus, the conversation surrounding HR79 encompasses not only the benefits of the proposed coverage but also the broader financial implications for the state and its citizens.
Urges and requests the Office of Group Benefits to study the cost for each member school board to terminate participation in the programs offered by the Office of Group Benefits
Requests a study of the costs and benefits of mandating coverage for therapies and treatments for PANS, PANDAS, and both conditions as types of AE by private insurance plans in the state of La.
Requests the Group Benefits Policy and Planning Board within the office of group benefits to study and prepare a cost benefit analysis for the provision of anti-obesity treatments and services for plan participants.
Requests the Louisiana Supreme Court to study the costs and benefits of mandatory, legal professional liability coverage for attorneys in private practice in this state and to study the benefits of requiring attorneys to provide certain notification to the Louisiana State Bar Association
Requests the Office of Group Benefits to conduct a study on the financial benefits of establishing a program to address the high rate of obesity in La.
Requests the Office of Group Benefits to conduct a study on the financial benefits of establishing a program to address the high rate of obesity in La.