Louisiana House Bill HR89

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/27/22
• Refer: 4/28/22
• Report Pass: 5/5/22
• Passed: 5/17/22

Caption

Urges and requests the local governing authority of Calcasieu Parish and the Calcasieu Parish Animal Services and Adoption Center to become a "no kill" animal shelter

Impact

If enacted, HR 89 would impact local animal control and shelter operations in Calcasieu Parish by catalyzing the adoption of comprehensive programs aimed at enhancing animal welfare. Programs may include fostering networks, public education initiatives, and health and behavioral treatment for adoptable pets. This shift towards a no kill policy would necessitate not just changes in euthanasia practices, but also broader transformations in shelter management, fostering partnerships, and community engagement.

Summary

House Resolution 89 urges and requests the governing authority of Calcasieu Parish and its Animal Services and Adoption Center to transition into a 'no kill' shelter by implementing policies that prevent the euthanization of healthy dogs and cats before the end of 2025. This resolution aligns with wider efforts to reduce euthanasia rates for adoptable animals, which have been a significant concern in Louisiana, as the state currently ranks high in national statistics for animal euthanasia.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HR 89 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among animal advocacy groups and community members who prioritize humane treatment for animals. However, concerns may exist regarding the feasibility of transitioning to a no kill model, especially if resources or infrastructure in place are insufficient to support the necessary programs and policies. Nonetheless, statistics indicating public opposition to euthanasia practices bolster the affirmation of the bill's goals.

Contention

Potential points of contention surrounding HR 89 include the practicality of implementing a no kill policy in a shelter environment that may be under-resourced or overwhelmed with stray and homeless animals. Critics might argue about the financial implications, logistical challenges, and whether such mandates could lead to unintended consequences like increased instances of animal neglect or overpopulation. Addressing these concerns will likely be crucial in ensuring the effective passage and execution of the resolution.