Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB211

Introduced
3/3/22  
Introduced
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Engrossed
4/5/22  
Engrossed
4/5/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
5/2/22  
Report Pass
5/2/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Chaptered
5/24/22  
Passed
5/24/22  

Caption

Provides for changes to the "Choose Life" special prestige license plate. (8/1/22)

Impact

This bill modifies existing state law to more clearly define the qualifications and stipulations for organizations wishing to receive funds collected from the sale of 'Choose Life' license plates. It mandates that at least fifty percent of the funds be utilized for tangible assistance for expectant mothers, such as clothing, housing, food, and transportation. This shift in policy is designed to provide a stronger safety net for vulnerable populations while emphasizing childbirth and adoption over abortion-related services.

Summary

Senate Bill 211 focuses on amending the regulations surrounding the 'Choose Life' special prestige license plate in Louisiana. The bill seeks to expand the uses for royalty fees collected from the license plates to include support for programs aimed at assisting expectant mothers who are considering parenting their children or making adoption plans. It emphasizes the importance of providing not just financial aid but also essential material needs for these mothers, ensuring that they receive necessary support during pregnancy and after childbirth.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding SB211 appears to be supportive, particularly among proponents of anti-abortion and pro-life initiatives. Supporters argue that the bill provides much-needed resources for expectant mothers and reinforces a pro-life ethos. Conversely, there are concerns from various groups regarding the restrictions placed on receiving organizations, particularly the prohibition of funds to those affiliated with abortion services, which some view as unnecessarily limiting and potentially stigmatizing for women seeking comprehensive reproductive health care.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of restricting funds to organizations providing abortion-related services. Critics argue that the bill could contribute to a narrower support network for women, especially in situations where comprehensive reproductive options are needed. The language used in the bill specifically excludes any organizations involved in abortion counseling, which raises questions about the accessibility and objectivity of the resources available to expectant mothers in diverse circumstances.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.