Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB472

Introduced
4/5/22  
Introduced
4/5/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Report Pass
5/10/22  
Engrossed
5/16/22  
Engrossed
5/16/22  
Refer
5/17/22  
Refer
5/17/22  
Report Pass
5/26/22  
Report Pass
5/26/22  
Enrolled
6/5/22  
Enrolled
6/5/22  
Chaptered
6/18/22  
Chaptered
6/18/22  
Passed
6/18/22  

Caption

Prohibits contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB 472 will significantly alter the regulatory framework governing ownership of critical infrastructure in Louisiana. It specifies the requirements for reporting ownership, organization structures, and financial obligations associated with the maintenance of these critical entities. Furthermore, failure to comply with these reporting mandates will result in the denial of permits or licenses necessary for operation, therefore placing additional pressure on owners to maintain clear documentation of their holdings.

Summary

Senate Bill 472 introduces the Transparency in Ownership of Critical Infrastructure Law in Louisiana, aimed at enhancing oversight of ownership concerning facilities deemed critical to the state's public welfare. This legislation identifies critical infrastructure as encompassing various operational sectors, including transportation, energy production, and agricultural holdings exceeding 160 acres. The bill seeks to ensure public safety and security by mandating that individuals or entities owning such infrastructure disclose their ownership details to designated state authorities by specified deadlines.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 472 appears supportive among proponents who argue that increased transparency will enhance state security and accountability. Advocates believe that by monitoring ownership, potential threats to critical infrastructure can be mitigated. However, there may be concerns from property owners regarding privacy and the administrative burden of compliance with these reporting requirements, indicating a need for a balance between security and business operations.

Contention

While proponents of SB 472 emphasize the necessity of transparency for safeguarding community interests, detractors might argue that the bill imposes excessive regulatory constraints on private enterprises. There are considerations regarding the implications for foreign investments and ownership within critical sectors, and the potential for the law to affect operational freedoms for businesses involved in these industries.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT HB0355

Mining and Critical Infrastructure Materials Amendments

CA AB1539

Commercial vessels: protection and indemnity insurance.

CA SB74

Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation: Infrastructure Gap-Fund Program.

CA SB1253

Infrastructure plan: flood control: delta levees.

CA SB955

Office of Planning and Research: Infrastructure Gap-Fund Program.

CA AB1359

Cybersecurity: critical infrastructure business: breach notification.

HI SB897

Relating To Energy.

CA AB3006

Energy: offshore wind generation.