Louisiana Senate Bill SR202

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/5/22
• Passed: 6/6/22

Caption

Recognizes the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's Working Definition of Antisemitism and endorses its use to identify antisemitism discrimination.

Impact

The resolution aims to strengthen protections against antisemitism within Louisiana by providing a clear and consistent definition for use in monitoring, analyzing, and combating discriminatory actions against Jewish people. By endorsing the IHRA's definition, Louisiana's government reiterates its commitment to fostering an inclusive and equitable society. This move aligns with similar legislative actions taken in other states across the U.S. and internationally, emphasizing a collective effort to confront hate and bigotry.

Summary

Senate Resolution 202 (SR202), introduced by Senator Henry, recognizes the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism. The resolution endorses the use of this definition as a vital tool for identifying and addressing antisemitic discrimination. It comes in response to a concerning rise in antisemitism and violent acts against the Jewish community, as documented by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and FBI statistics indicating a significant uptick in hate crimes targeted at Jewish individuals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SR202 has been supportive, highlighting a shared concern about the rising tide of antisemitism. Lawmakers, advocacy groups, and community leaders have lauded the resolution as a proactive step towards combating hate crimes and ensuring the safety and rights of the Jewish population. The resolution reflects a broader recognition of the importance of historical awareness and its role in promoting tolerance and pluralism in society.

Contention

While the resolution has garnered significant support, there may be contention regarding its implications for discussions surrounding free speech and the potential politicization of antisemitism. Critics may argue that definitions of antisemitism, particularly those including aspects of anti-Israel sentiment, could lead to debates over the limits of acceptable discourse. However, the resolution itself focuses on fostering dialogue to address antisemitism rather than limiting speech, which is an important distinction to maintain.