Requires auditees to report progress on implementation of recommendations following a performance audit (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Impact
The passage of HB 288 is expected to enhance transparency within governmental agencies. By formalizing the process of reporting progress on audit recommendations, the bill not only encourages agencies to take corrective actions but also fosters a culture of accountability. This measure may lead to improvements in how public resources are managed, as agencies will have clear timelines and expectations regarding the implementation of audit recommendations. Additionally, the legislative auditor is empowered to request further information if needed and compile annual reports on the progress, making this information publicly accessible.
Summary
House Bill 288, initiated by Representative Freiberg, aims to improve accountability in governmental operations by requiring auditees to report their progress on implementing recommendations from performance audits. The bill mandates that auditees submit a progress report to the legislative auditor no later than July 31 in the second fiscal year following the performance audit. This initiative is designed to ensure that the findings of performance audits lead to tangible improvements in public sector efficiency and effectiveness.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 288 appears to be positively inclined, as there is recognition among lawmakers of the importance of effective oversight and accountability in government operations. The unanimous support indicated by the Senate vote, which saw 37 legislators in favor with no opposition, suggests a broad consensus that the provisions of the bill are necessary and beneficial. This sentiment reflects a shared commitment among lawmakers to improving state governance and ensuring that the state agencies operate efficiently and transparently.
Contention
While there was no documented opposition to HB 288 during the voting process, it is possible that some concerns may arise in discussions around the practical implications of report implementations. Questions might include how effectively agencies can meet the deadlines set forth by the bill and whether the requirements impose an undue burden on smaller agencies or offices. However, the overall lack of contention during the voting suggests a smooth legislative process without significant barriers or opposing viewpoints.
Relative to the legislative auditor, requires the auditor to provide for certain notifications of noncompliant auditees and requires auditees to designate an individual to file reports with the auditor and notify the auditor
Requires local auditees and vendors who collect taxes on behalf of others to have certain annual audits and to submit certain sworn statements regarding tax collections to the legislative auditor (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)
Reduces frequency of enhanced audits required of certain local auditees with at least three consecutive years of enhanced audits with no findings. (8/1/18) (EN NO IMPACT LF See Note)
Authorizes the legislative auditor to obtain certain information about employees with access to federal tax records of auditees. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)
Provides that certain audits completed by the office of the legislative auditor shall be reported to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget on an annual basis. (7/1/14) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)