Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB573

Introduced
3/31/23  
Introduced
3/31/23  
Refer
3/31/23  
Refer
3/31/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Engrossed
4/19/23  
Engrossed
4/19/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Report Pass
6/1/23  
Report Pass
6/1/23  
Enrolled
6/7/23  
Enrolled
6/7/23  
Chaptered
6/14/23  
Chaptered
6/14/23  
Passed
6/14/23  

Caption

Provides relative to prohibited provisions in certain public contracts

Impact

The enactment of HB 573 will directly impact the way public contracts are formulated in Louisiana, particularly concerning liability provisions. By making certain contractual stipulations invalid, the bill seeks to ensure clearer and fairer contracting processes. It is intended to provide a safeguard against disproportionate liability placed on contractors who might otherwise be held responsible for accidents or damages that are not their fault, promoting fairness and reducing legal disputes stemming from these provisions.

Summary

House Bill 573 aims to amend existing Louisiana laws regarding prohibited provisions in public contracts. Specifically, the bill declares that any provision that requires a private contracting party to assume liability for damages that are not caused by their own negligence—specifically injuries or property damage caused by others—is contrary to public policy. This legislation seeks to protect public entities from overreaching liability clauses in contracts that do not align with state regulatory standards on motor carrier transportation and construction contracts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 573 appears to be largely positive among those in the construction and transportation sectors, as the bill offers clarity and protection against unjust contractual obligations. Supporters view the bill as necessary to align existing laws with reasonable standards of liability and accountability. However, there may be concerns from those who argue that stricter regulations are needed to hold contractors accountable for their responsibilities, suggesting a mix of support and criticism based on various stakeholder perspectives.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the implications of this bill on the accountability of contractors. While many support reducing excessive liability risks, critics could argue that it could lead to a lack of responsibility among contractors for their actions or negligence. The balance between protecting public interests and ensuring contractor accountability will likely be a significant focus in future discussions about this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.