Requests retirement systems and the state treasurer to report on companies that do not invest in certain energy companies
Impact
If adopted, HCR70 would require the state treasurer and the directors of retirement systems to compile a comprehensive report by October 1, 2023. This report must detail any entities that utilize nonpecuniary factors in their investment approaches, including those boycotting energy companies. It would also provide insights into the asset allocation of pension and retirement funds, emphasizing their investment distributions both within Louisiana and on a global scale. Such transparency aims to reassess and possibly amend investment strategies used by state retirement systems to robustly benefit from the fossil fuel industry’s contributions to the state economy.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 70 (HCR70) urges the state treasurer and Louisiana's state retirement systems to report on investment advisors and companies that discriminate against the fossil fuel industry through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies. The resolution emphasizes the importance of these fiduciaries acting in the best financial interest of beneficiaries, and not using nonpecuniary factors in their investment decision-making processes. It requests specific information regarding investment management companies that apply such policies, aiming to hold them accountable for potential biases in investment choices that may overlook profitable prospects in the fossil fuel sector.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR70 appears to align with protecting the interests of the fossil fuel industry, reflecting concerns from legislators who represent natural resource-heavy regions of Louisiana. Proponents of this resolution likely view it as an essential intervention against perceived discrimination in investment practices against traditional energy sectors. However, the mention of ESG factors hints at a broader legislative discourse regarding balancing economic interests with sustainable investing strategies, signaling a growing tension between economic development and environmental considerations.
Contention
Notable contention arises around the notion of using ESG criteria in investment decisions, which some believe can straddle the line between responsible financial management and ideological bias. Advocates for HCR70 contend that any disinvestment from fossil fuels, based on ESG considerations, could harm Louisiana's economic health due to the state’s reliance on oil and gas industries. Conversely, critics may argue that prioritizing short-term financial returns without accounting for environmental impacts fails to meet the future demands of sustainable governance, thus highlighting significant ethical and practical concerns in investment management.
A bill for an act concerning public contracts with companies that boycott certain companies or that engage in nonpecuniary social investment policies.(Formerly SSB 1094.)
A bill for an act concerning public contracts with companies that boycott certain companies or that engage in nonpecuniary social investment policies.(See SF 507.)
A bill for an act concerning public contracts by public funds with companies that boycott certain companies or that engage in nonpecuniary social investment policies.(Formerly HF 2.)
An Act Concerning The Powers Of The State Treasurer, Divestment Of State Funds Invested In Companies Doing Business In Iran And Sudan, And The Membership Of A Medical Examining Board And The Connecticut State Employees Retirement Commission.