Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB247

Introduced
2/27/24  
Introduced
2/27/24  
Refer
2/27/24  
Refer
2/27/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Enrolled
5/30/24  
Enrolled
5/30/24  
Chaptered
6/10/24  
Chaptered
6/10/24  
Passed
6/10/24  

Caption

Provides relative to criminal penalties for accepting overpayment of unemployment benefits

Impact

The amendments introduced in HB 247 impact existing state laws regarding unemployment compensation. By increasing the consequences for fraudulent claims, the bill aims to safeguard state resources and ensure that benefits are appropriately distributed. As a result, claimants may face stricter scrutiny regarding their eligibility and declarations, thus potentially reducing incidents of fraud and overpayment.

Summary

House Bill 247, authored by Representative Echols, revises regulations concerning unemployment compensation in the state of Louisiana. The bill specifically addresses disqualifications related to fraudulent claims, tightening the conditions under which individuals may lose their benefits for making false statements or failing to disclose material facts. Additionally, it mandates that individuals who receive overpayments due to fraud will be subject to penalties, including criminal referrals for amounts exceeding one thousand dollars.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 247 appears to be supportive among legislators who prioritize fiscal responsibility and integrity in the administration of unemployment benefits. Proponents argue that the bill will deter fraudulent claims and protect the integrity of the unemployment compensation system. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding the implications for legitimate claimants who might inadvertently face penalties under the stricter regulations.

Contention

A notable point of contention raised during discussions of HB 247 pertains to the potential for misunderstanding or misadministering the law, which could lead to innocent claimants facing harsh penalties. Critics argue that the bill could inadvertently harm those who are genuinely in need, particularly in times of economic hardship. Calls for additional safeguards to protect vulnerable groups may be a point of further discussion as the bill progresses through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.