Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB610

Introduced
3/1/24  
Introduced
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  

Caption

Requires businesses to offer a payment in cash for transactions

Impact

If enacted, HB 610 would introduce significant changes into the Louisiana Revised Statutes by promoting consumer protection in financial transactions. The key implication is the legal requirement for businesses to accept cash, which would address accessibility issues for people who do not use credit or debit cards. The bill does exclude specific categories such as certain service providers, electronic transactions, and high-value transactions, suggesting a tailored approach to regulation that recognizes various market dynamics.

Summary

House Bill 610 mandates that businesses must accept cash as a valid form of payment for in-person transactions. It defines what constitutes a 'business', 'cash', and 'customer', primarily targeting retail businesses that conduct face-to-face services. The bill seeks to ensure that individuals who prefer or require cash payment options are not marginalized in accessing goods and services. This legislation reflects growing concerns over cashless economies and the potential exclusion of certain demographics who rely on cash for transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 610 appears to be mixed. Supporters advocate for the rights of consumers and the necessity for payment options that suit all individuals, arguing that cash is a fundamental part of financial inclusion. In contrast, critics may view the bill as an overregulation that could impose challenges on businesses adapting to modern payment methods. The debate around this legislation emphasizes broader issues of accessibility and the balance between innovation in payment systems and traditional cash transactions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased operational burdens on businesses required to handle cash transactions and adhere to the stated penalties for non-compliance. The graduated penalties for violations—ranging from $2,500 for a first offense to $10,000 for subsequent violations—have raised concerns among business owners about the feasibility of compliance. Additionally, excluding certain services from the cash acceptance requirement may lead to disparities where specific businesses adapt differently, impacting the uniformity of the law's application.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB239

Provides relative to certain assets and transactions subject to the Uniform Commercial Code

LA HB641

Provides for the termination of certain tax exemptions, exclusions, credits, deductions, and other tax incentives (EG INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB642

Provides relative to sales and use taxation of certain digital products and services (EG INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA SB185

Provides relative to the licensing and regulation of virtual businesses. (8/1/23) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA HB154

Establishes an income tax exemption for certain veteran-owned businesses (OR DECREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB17

Provides relative to the regulation of cannabis (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

LA HB430

Authorizes payments from unclaimed funds to certain agents for locating, delivering, recovering, or assisting in the recovery of unclaimed property (EN INCREASE SG EX See Note)

LA HB427

Provides relative to disclosure by healthcare facilities to patients of prices for certain items and services (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB91

Provides for prohibition of immovable property transactions by certain foreign actors. (8/1/23)

LA HB215

Provides relative to acceptable methods of payment for the office of motor vehicles (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.