Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB617

Introduced
3/1/24  
Introduced
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Engrossed
4/15/24  
Engrossed
4/15/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Enrolled
5/22/24  
Enrolled
5/22/24  
Chaptered
6/3/24  
Passed
6/3/24  

Caption

Provides relative to broadband

Impact

The implementation of HB 617 is expected to have significant implications for state laws relating to broadband funding and infrastructure development. It allows for a flexible approach to funding, enabling the state to address gaps in infrastructure that currently hinder broadband rollout. The authority to promulgate rules and establish scoring criteria for project eligibility will aid in structuring how these funds are allocated, ultimately aiming to narrow the digital divide in rural and underserved regions of Louisiana.

Summary

House Bill 617 aims to enhance broadband access in unserved municipalities by reallocating unobligated funds from the GUMBO 1.0 program. This act, introduced by Representative Deshotel, recognizes the pressing need for improved internet connectivity, particularly in areas lacking adequate service. By facilitating the use of existing funds for eligible non-broadband infrastructure projects, the bill seeks to expedite the establishment of necessary infrastructure that can later support broadband installation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 617 is largely positive, as it aligns with ongoing efforts to enhance broadband connectivity, which has become increasingly important for education, business, and telehealth, especially in light of recent public health concerns. Stakeholders, including various advocacy groups and local governments, view the bill as a proactive measure toward addressing long-standing disparities in internet access. However, there may be some concerns regarding the efficacy and oversight of fund allocation, and whether it sufficiently targets the most underserved areas.

Contention

While the bill has gained support for its intentions, there are points of contention that could arise regarding the distribution and management of funds. Questions may be raised about how 'eligible nonbroadband infrastructure project uses' are defined and which projects will ultimately receive funding. Furthermore, the lack of specific criteria in the initial proposal may lead to disparities in how funds are utilized across different municipalities. As stakeholders engage in discussions, it will be crucial to establish clear guidelines to ensure that the intended goals of equitable broadband access are achieved.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.