Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB645

Introduced
3/1/24  
Introduced
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Engrossed
3/25/24  
Engrossed
3/25/24  
Refer
3/26/24  
Refer
3/26/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  
Chaptered
5/22/24  
Chaptered
5/22/24  
Passed
5/22/24  

Caption

Moves responsibility for the collection of the electric and hybrid vehicle fee from the Department of Revenue to the office of motor vehicles

Impact

This legislation is expected to impact how road funding is collected and allocated in Louisiana, particularly as electric and hybrid vehicles become increasingly common on the roads. By establishing a dedicated fee for these vehicles, the state aims to secure funding necessary for maintaining highways and transportation infrastructure, which may be underfunded as gasoline tax revenues decline. The bill also involves the repeal of a previous provision within state law, emphasizing a shift in the administrative responsibility for these fees.

Summary

House Bill 645 aims to amend regulations surrounding road usage fee collection for electric and hybrid vehicles in Louisiana. The bill introduces an annual road usage fee of up to $110 for electric vehicles and $60 for hybrid vehicles, as part of an effort to ensure that owners of these vehicles contribute to the maintenance and development of road infrastructure. The provisions will take effect starting January 1, 2026, upon which the responsibility for fee collection will transition from the Department of Revenue to the office of motor vehicles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 645 appears to be generally positive among legislators, reflecting a growing recognition of the need to incorporate electric and hybrid vehicles into existing road funding structures. However, there may be underlying concerns about the adequacy of the proposed fees and their ability to truly cover infrastructure costs. Overall, many stakeholders likely view this as a progressive step toward sustainability and fiscal responsibility in transportation.

Contention

While HB 645 has received support, discussions could arise regarding equity in fee collection, particularly if fees are perceived as disproportionately affecting low-income vehicle owners or if the pricing structure does not adequately reflect actual road usage. The bill’s enactment signifies a broader state commitment to integrating electric and hybrid options into the transportation funding framework, but it is crucial for lawmakers to ensure that these fees are equitable and effectively administered.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.