Names the Lake Borgne Surge Barrier after President George W. Bush
Impact
The enactment of HB 660 serves both a symbolic and practical purpose, as it aligns with Louisiana's ongoing initiatives to strengthen flood control infrastructure in light of increasing climate-related challenges. By naming the surge barrier after a prominent political figure, the state aims to draw public attention to the importance of such structures in national discussions regarding disaster preparedness and response. This move positions the surge barrier within a larger narrative of federal and state cooperation in infrastructure development.
Summary
House Bill 660 is an act that names the Lake Borgne Surge Barrier, colloquially referred to as the 'Great Wall of Louisiana', in honor of former President George W. Bush. The bill enacts a new section, R.S. 38:327.1, that officially designates this flood control structure under the name of Bush. This action recognizes the significance of the structure in the context of Louisiana's efforts to manage flood risks and enhance coastal resilience.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 660 is largely positive, with broad support for the recognition of the surge barrier. Legislators expressed unanimous support during the final passage, indicating a cohesive agreement on the significance of honoring past leaders who have contributed to disaster preparedness efforts. However, the naming also raises discussions regarding the appropriateness of memorializing political figures in state infrastructure, a point that could have been contested if not for the apparent consensus among lawmakers.
Contention
While there are no notable points of contention in the voting process or discussions around HB 660, the naming of infrastructure after political figures can sometimes prompt debate about the legacy of those individuals. In this case, the name George W. Bush may elicit both praise and criticism, depending on varying public perceptions of his administration's policies and their effects on states like Louisiana. Nonetheless, such discussions seem to have been minimal in the context of this particular bill.
Urges and requests the president of the United States to reconsider the signed agreement that facilitates growth of certain aquaculture exports from Ecuador to the United States