Lowers the ACT score required for initial qualification for a Taylor Opportunity Program for Students award for students who complete approved home study programs (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
If enacted, this bill would significantly affect the landscape of educational funding and accessibility for students who have opted for home schooling. By aligning the eligibility criteria for TOPS awards, the bill could encourage more families to pursue home education without fearing that their students would be at a disadvantage when applying for scholarship programs. This change reflects an acknowledgment of the validity of home schooling as a legitimate educational pathway in the state.
House Bill 70 proposes to amend the eligibility requirements for students completing approved home study programs who wish to qualify for a Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) award. Currently, students who complete home study programs are required to achieve higher ACT scores than those who graduate from traditional high schools. HB70 seeks to eliminate this higher score requirement, thereby allowing home study students to qualify by meeting the same minimum ACT scores as their peers in traditional education paths.
The reception of HB70 appears to be predominantly positive among home schooling advocates and families, who view the bill as a necessary step to equalize educational opportunities. Supporters argue that the existing requirement for higher ACT scores places undue stress on home-study students and does not accurately reflect their capabilities. However, there may be some concerns from traditional education supporters who value the established metrics of performance as a measure of readiness for higher education.
One point of contention surrounding HB70 could stem from differing opinions on the efficacy of home schooling versus traditional schooling, particularly concerning standardized testing. Opponents might argue that maintaining higher standards is crucial for ensuring that all students receiving state financial aid meet certain academic benchmarks. Thus, the debate over HB70 highlights broader issues in educational equality, state funding for education, and the assessment of student readiness for post-secondary education.