Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB905

Introduced
4/2/24  
Introduced
4/2/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Engrossed
4/22/24  
Refer
4/23/24  
Refer
4/23/24  
Report Pass
5/7/24  
Report Pass
5/7/24  
Enrolled
5/15/24  
Enrolled
5/15/24  
Chaptered
5/23/24  
Chaptered
5/23/24  
Passed
5/23/24  

Caption

Permits jurors to donate their per diem compensation to the Capital Area Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 905 is expected to enhance the financial resources available for CASA, which plays a crucial role in supporting children within the judicial process. By allowing jurors to donate their per diem, the bill creates a new avenue for community involvement and philanthropy while potentially increasing CASA's operational capacity. The bill outlines specific procedures for how these donations are to be handled, ensuring that participating jurors are informed and their contributions are acknowledged appropriately.

Summary

House Bill 905, recently enacted in Louisiana, allows jurors serving in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court to voluntarily donate their per diem compensation to the Capital Area Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA). This bill establishes a two-year pilot program wherein jurors can choose to direct their compensation, which is typically intended for their service on a jury, towards supporting this nonprofit organization that advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the court system. This provision aims to not only provide financial support to CASA but also engage jurors in the community in a meaningful way.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 905 appears to be largely positive, as it encourages civic engagement and community support for a critical nonprofit organization. Lawmakers expressed support for the bill, highlighting its potential benefits for the welfare of children in distressing situations. Advocates for CASA have praised the move as a win-win, enabling jurors to make a tangible impact while facilitating the court's social responsibility.

Contention

While the bill seems to have garnered broad support, there is a potential area for contention regarding the voluntary nature of the donations. Some critics may argue that while the program is designed to be opt-in, it may inadvertently pressure jurors into donating, even if indirectly. Additionally, concerns may arise about the management of the collected donations and the transparency of the allocation process, ensuring they are used appropriately for CASA's mission.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.