Creates the crime of possessing, trafficking, or importing a child sex doll. (8/1/24) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
The legislation introduces substantial penalties for violations, ensuring that those found guilty of possessing a child sex doll may face up to one year in prison and/or a fine. For trafficking offenses, the penalties are increased, with monetary fines reaching up to $10,000 and potential imprisonment of up to two years. Additionally, the bill establishes a reporting mechanism where courts must report convictions to the Louisiana Supreme Court, providing oversight and data accumulation regarding offenses of this nature.
Senate Bill 107 aims to address the growing concern over the possession, trafficking, and importing of child sex dolls in Louisiana. The bill defines specific actions as crimes, including knowingly possessing, distributing, or transporting a child sex doll, which is categorized as an anatomically correct doll resembling a child under 18 years intended for sexual stimulation. The passage of this bill is seen as a significant step in safeguarding minors from sexual exploitation and preventing the normalizing of such harmful behaviors.
The sentiment surrounding SB 107 appears largely supportive among legislators, particularly those advocating for child welfare and public safety. The unanimous vote in favor of the bill indicates a strong consensus on the issue among senators, reflecting a collective priority to combat child exploitation. However, there may be underlying concerns among some advocates regarding the implications of such laws on personal freedoms and the potential for misinterpretation of intended actions between innocent and illicit uses of similar items.
While SB 107 has gained widespread support, the potential contention may arise concerning its definitions and enforcement, particularly regarding the delineation of what constitutes a 'child sex doll'. Questions may also be raised about the approach to reporting and monitoring, as the judicial system's involvement is highlighted in the bill. Critics may argue that while tackling the issue is crucial, care must be taken to ensure that the application of such laws does not inadvertently punish individuals for non-criminal behavior.