Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB13

Introduced
2/25/24  
Introduced
2/25/24  
Refer
2/25/24  
Refer
2/25/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
4/30/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/14/24  
Report Pass
5/14/24  
Enrolled
5/23/24  
Chaptered
5/28/24  

Caption

Prohibits an elected official who has been removed from office from filling the vacancy created by the removal. (8/1/24) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The passage of SB 13 will modify state laws related to retirement, resignation, and removal of elected officials. It addresses a gap in the current law by explicitly outlining the consequences for officials removed from their positions, thereby aiming to prevent such individuals from resuming their roles or influencing appointments. The intent is to maintain public trust in elected positions and to ensure that those who have failed to uphold their responsibilities cannot easily re-enter office.

Summary

Senate Bill 13, introduced by Senator Seabaugh, amends the existing law concerning vacancies in elected offices in Louisiana. The bill stipulates that any elected official who has been removed from office is prohibited from being appointed to fill that vacancy, as well as from running for election to fill that vacancy, unless the removal was due to a legally curable defect. This change seeks to enhance the integrity and accountability of elected offices within the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 13 appears to be supportive, particularly among lawmakers who advocate for stricter governance standards. By preventing removed officials from returning to office, supporters argue that the bill will enhance public confidence in the integrity of election processes. However, there may also be concerns raised regarding individuals' rights to seek redress for their removals, which could reflect a divided opinion on the scope and application of this measure.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding this bill lies in the balance it strikes between ensuring accountability and providing due process for elected officials. Critics might argue that the prohibition could be seen as overly punitive, restricting political opportunities for those who have been removed due to political disagreements rather than misconduct. This raises fundamental questions about the nature of political accountability and the mechanisms in place to ensure fair treatment of elected officials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.