Prohibits use of a handheld wireless telecommunications device by a person when operating a motor vehicle upon any public roadway in this state. (8/1/24) (RE SEE FISC NOTE LF RV See Note)
If enacted, SB 98 will significantly impact state laws regarding distracted driving by enforcing stricter regulations on the use of wireless telecommunications devices. The focus is to enhance road safety by reducing occurrences of distracted driving, particularly in vulnerable areas like school zones and construction zones, where the consequences of such distractions can be particularly dire. The bill streamlines previous regulations into clearer, easier-to-follow rules while increasing penalties to deter violations and promote adherence to the law.
Senate Bill 98 aims to encompass existing laws regarding the use of wireless telecommunications devices while operating a motor vehicle into a single statute. The bill consolidates numerous statutes that previously defined prohibitions regarding such devices, repealing outdated sections and maintaining only necessary provisions while ensuring that laws are updated to reflect advancements in technology. Most notably, the bill establishes that the use of a handheld wireless device is prohibited on public roadways, making these offenses enforceable during both primary and secondary situations, depending on the location of the violation.
The sentiment around SB 98 is generally supportive among safety advocates who argue that reducing distractions while driving is crucial for public safety. However, some concern exists regarding the balance of enforcement and drivers' rights, particularly in how law enforcement can interact with individuals accused of violations. Critics argue that overly stringent regulations may lead to potential misuse of authority by law enforcement officials, particularly regarding searches and inspections.
Key points of contention surrounding SB 98 involve the enforcement of penalties, which are to be applied more strictly than before, including repeated violations leading to significant fines and potential license suspensions. There is also debate about the exceptions allowed for certain individuals, such as utility workers and law enforcement, who may use devices for specific functions. Additionally, forwarding the requirement for probable cause for officers to stop or question motorists raises questions about the practicality and potential for bias in traffic policing.