Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB105

Introduced
3/24/25  
Refer
3/24/25  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the matter entitled Marchand v. State of La. et al.

Impact

If enacted, HB 105 will enable the state to fulfill its financial obligation arising from the court ruling, thus ensuring that the judgment amount is paid in accordance with legal requirements. The bill outlines that the payment will only occur after appropriate documentation has been presented to the state treasurer. Notably, the bill also stipulates that interest on the judgment will cease to accrue as of the effective date of the Act, indicating a clear fiscal responsibility on the part of the state to resolve such legal matters promptly.

Summary

House Bill 105 mandates the appropriation of $450,000 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2024-2025 to satisfy a consent judgment resulting from the lawsuit "Jared Marchand v. State of Louisiana et al." This judgment was handed down by the 21st Judicial District court in Tangipahoa Parish. The appropriation is intended solely for the payment of the judgment, which includes principal, interest, court costs, and expert witness fees as specified in the judgment itself.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding HB 105 appears to be focused on the necessity of fulfilling legal obligations as mandated by the court. There may be support for the bill among government representatives who emphasize the importance of maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that the state's financial obligations are met without delay. Discussions surrounding the bill are likely to highlight the need for prompt payment to prevent further legal complications or financial liabilities.

Contention

While the bill itself is relatively straightforward, potential points of contention could arise from differing opinions on the appropriateness of using state funds for judgment payments. Some legislators may raise concerns about fiscal priorities and whether this expenditure aligns with other urgent state needs. Nonetheless, as the bill addresses a legally binding judgment, resistance may be limited, focusing more on the allocation of resources and the implications for the state's continuing financial commitments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0326

Judgment Renewal Modifications

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.

UT HB0538

Judgment Information Amendments

TX SB944

Relating to the adoption of the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.

TX HB2122

Relating to the adoption of the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.

AR HB1959

To Abolish The Use Of A Writ Of Scire Facias As The Means Of Reviving An Outstanding Judgment; To Allow A Judgment To Be Revived By Notice; And To Amend The Law Concerning The Fees To Be Charged By Clerks Of The Circuit Courts.

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

TX HB3115

Relating to the release of a judgment lien on homestead property.