Designates the bridge located on U.S. 167 in Winn Parish as the "Clayton Horne Memorial Bridge"
The bill requires the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to put up appropriate signage that reflects the newly designated name of the bridge. Importantly, this responsibility is contingent upon the receipt of local or private funds sufficient to cover the costs associated with the materials and installation of the signs, which cannot exceed $550 per sign. This funding requirement might encourage community involvement and support for the bill, as it effectively places the financial burden primarily upon local stakeholders rather than state revenues.
House Bill 174 primarily seeks to honor the late Clayton Horne by designating a specific bridge located on U.S. 167 over the Kansas City Southern railroad tracks in Winn Parish, Louisiana, as the 'Clayton Horne Memorial Bridge.' This legislation serves both a commemorative and functional purpose by ensuring that local residents and travelers are aware of this designation. The law is straightforward and essentially acts as a form of recognition for an individual who may have made notable contributions to the local community or has historical significance.
The general sentiment around HB 174 seems to be positive, as it embodies a community-friendly action that fosters local pride. Designating a bridge in memory of an individual can resonate deeply with community members, reinforcing connections between public infrastructure and local history. While specific debates or controversies are not evident in the limited text provided, it is possible that some individuals may question the allocation of local funds for signage, which would need to be considered during discussions surrounding its enactment.
There are minimal points of contention directly visible in the bill itself, given its commemorative nature. However, it is worth noting that the stipulation for local or private funding for signage may prompt discussions about public versus private responsibilities in community memorializations. Furthermore, the bill does indicate a tangible cost associated with its implementation, which would require oversight to ensure that any necessary fundraising does not lead to contention among community members about the expenses involved.