Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB378

Introduced
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
4/14/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
5/19/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
5/29/25  

Caption

Lowers the ACT score required for initial qualification for a Taylor Opportunity Program for Students award for students who complete approved home study programs (EGF +$172,184 SG EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, the bill would modify existing education regulations in Louisiana regarding the eligibility criteria for TOPS awards. Specifically, the law would permit home study students to qualify by achieving set baseline scores: 17 for TOPS-Tech, 20 for Opportunity, 23 for Performance, and 27 for Honors. This change is expected to benefit students who pursue non-traditional educational paths, promoting inclusivity in scholarship opportunities for higher education.

Summary

House Bill 378 proposes to lower the ACT score requirements for students who complete approved home study programs to attain initial qualification for the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) awards. Under the current regulations, students from home study programs are required to achieve higher scores than their peers graduating from traditional high schools. The bill aims to eliminate this distinction by allowing home study students to meet the same minimum scores required for various TOPS awards, which are determined based on the type of award sought.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 378 appears to be generally positive among advocates for home education and educational equity. Supporters argue that the existing higher ACT score requirement creates unfair barriers to scholarship access for home study students. However, discussions in the legislative arena may highlight concerns from those who favor maintaining rigorous standards for these awards, potentially debating whether lowering the score could affect the perceived quality of recipients.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the overall implications of the bill on the academic rigor associated with TOPS awards. Critics might express concern that adjusting score requirements could dilute the integrity of the scholarship program and its ability to incentivize high academic performance. The balancing act between accessibility for all students and maintaining high standards will likely be focal during discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.