Louisiana House Bill HB484

Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/4/25
• Refer: 4/4/25
• Refer: 4/14/25

Caption

Provides for eligibility requirements for students participating in the student tuition organization tax credit program (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

Impact

If passed, HB 484 will effectively alter the landscape of educational funding in Louisiana by allowing an increased number of students to qualify for scholarships through the STOs. The stipulation that students with disabilities will not be subject to the income limitations places emphasis on equal access to education for underprivileged groups. Furthermore, the proposed legislation will permit qualified students to receive multiple scholarships, thereby enhancing financial opportunities for families seeking education for their children in nonpublic institutions.

Summary

House Bill 484 seeks to amend Louisiana's existing tax credit scheme for donations made to school tuition organizations (STOs) by expanding the criteria for eligible students. The bill proposes to include students with disabilities, which is a significant addition aimed at ensuring that disabled students can also benefit from the financial assistance offered through the tax credit program. This inclusion is part of broader efforts to promote educational equity and access for all students regardless of their special needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 484 is generally favorable among stakeholders advocating for educational equity, particularly for families with disabled children. Supporters argue that the bill rectifies existing limitations within the current law that inadvertently exclude disabled students from participating in educational options available to their peers. However, there may be opposing viewpoints regarding the implications of increasing tax credits on state budgets, potentially leading to contention during legislative discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the fiscal impact of expanding tax credits, which may result in decreased state revenue. Critics may argue that while the intention is noble, the long-term sustainability of such measures must be considered. Additionally, there may be apprehensions from public school advocates worried about the effect on funding and equal resources within the public education system. As the bill progresses, debate is likely to focus on balancing fiscal responsibility with the essential goal of providing equitable educational access to all students.