Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB648

Introduced
4/22/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/8/25  
Refer
5/12/25  
Engrossed
5/19/25  
Report Pass
5/21/25  

Caption

Increases candidate qualifying fees and dedicates the monies to the Campaign Sign Recycling Fund (EN INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 648 will modify the existing statutes regarding candidate qualifying fees, specifically augmenting the financial responsibility of candidates seeking office. The additional fees collected will be used to fund the Campaign Sign Recycling Fund, which will facilitate the creation of a more organized and environmentally friendly process for managing political signage. This change is expected to have a positive impact on the environment by reducing waste associated with campaign materials. Furthermore, it reinforces the necessity for sustainable practices in contemporary campaigning, aligning with broader public policy goals around environmental stewardship.

Summary

House Bill 648 aims to amend existing election laws in Louisiana by increasing candidate qualifying fees. These fees are a prerequisite for candidates to participate in elections and are intended to help fund the newly established Campaign Sign Recycling Fund. This fund is dedicated to the recycling of political campaign signs, thereby promoting environmental sustainability in politics and ensuring that campaign materials are disposed of responsibly. The bill emphasizes the importance of recycling campaign materials and encourages candidates to contribute to a greener approach to electioneering.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 648 appears to be generally positive, with supporters lauding the focus on environmental concerns and sustainability in political campaigns. There is a sense of agreement among legislators and constituents that recycling campaign signs can mitigate some environmental impacts and promote improved civic responsibility among candidates. However, there may be some dissent from candidates who could view the increased financial burden as a hindrance to their ability to run for office.

Contention

Potential points of contention surrounding HB 648 could stem from debate about the additional financial burdens imposed on candidates, particularly those from underrepresented communities or backgrounds. Critics may argue that raising qualifying fees could deter qualified individuals from entering the political arena, thereby impacting democratic representation. Additionally, there may be questions related to the management of the Campaign Sign Recycling Fund and the effectiveness of the recycling program, including its implementation and operational costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB84

Political Reform Act of 1974: political party committee disclosures.

AZ HB2024

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates

AZ HB2081

Ballot; presidential candidates; technical correction

AZ HB2101

Technical correction; presidential candidates; ballot

AZ SB1476

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates

AZ SB1654

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates.

CA SB505

Presidential primary elections.

NJ SCR112

Urges Congress to enact "Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2024" to reimburse State and local units for public safety expenses incurred during major presidential and vice presidential candidates' visits.