Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB133

Introduced
4/4/25  
Refer
4/4/25  
Refer
4/14/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Engrossed
4/30/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/15/25  
Enrolled
5/28/25  
Chaptered
6/8/25  

Caption

Provides relative to payment of employees after termination of employment. (8/1/25)

Impact

The enactment of SB133 signifies an important amendment to existing labor laws in Louisiana, specifically concerning how payments are managed after employment ends. This change could streamline the wage payment process for businesses, potentially reducing conflicts between employers and employees regarding payment timelines. However, the bill maintains that these provisions do not apply to profits interest granted by entities treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes, thus delineating its scope and applicability.

Summary

Senate Bill 133, proposed by Senator Pressly, addresses the payment of wages to employees following their termination of employment. Specifically, it enacts R.S. 23:631(F) of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, which aims to clarify which payment provisions apply after an employee has left a job. The bill is designed to create clearer regulations surrounding the timely payment of wages when an employee is discharged or resigns, ultimately benefiting workers by ensuring they receive their owed compensation promptly.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB133 appears to be positive, as it aims to protect employee rights regarding wage payments. Legislators who supported the bill likely view it as a necessary reform to enhance worker protections and ensure fair treatment in the wake of employment changes. However, there may be concerns from certain business sectors regarding the implications of these changes on operational procedures and potential liabilities.

Contention

While SB133 may be generally well-received for its intent to clarify wage payment provisions, some points of contention could arise, particularly concerning the exemption for profits interest granted by partnerships. Critics may argue that this exclusion complicates the bill's clarity or could leave certain workers without adequate protection depending on their employment circumstances. Furthermore, discussions surrounding the bill may highlight the balance between employee rights and business operational flexibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.