Louisiana Senate Bill SB76

Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Refer: 4/14/25
• Report Pass: 4/23/25
• Engrossed: 4/30/25
• Refer: 5/5/25
• Report Pass: 5/29/25
• Enrolled: 6/9/25
• Chaptered: 6/11/25
• Passed: 6/11/25

Caption

Provides for naming the soccer complex at Moore Park in Lafayette in honor of a deceased person. (8/1/25)

Impact

The enactment of SB76 will directly modify local governance regarding public naming rights for facilities within Lafayette. By allowing the governing body to freely name public properties in memory of individuals, it could set a precedent for similar requests in the future. This would enhance local government’s autonomy regarding community recognition efforts while potentially aligning with the wishes of residents who wish to commemorate key individuals.

Summary

Senate Bill 76 (SB76) is a legislative act introduced to provide specific authority for the naming of the soccer complex at Moore Park in Lafayette, Louisiana, in honor of a deceased individual, Deanna G. Bostick. The bill enacts a provision in R.S. 33:4712.26, allowing the city's governing authority to proceed with this naming despite existing laws that might restrict similar actions. This move is primarily targeted at honoring prominent community figures and recognizing their contributions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB76 appears to be positive. It has received unanimous support in the voting process, with 92 yeas and no nays, indicating a community and legislative consensus on the importance of honoring local figures. The bill is framed as a moral and respectful acknowledgment of contributions made to the community, which resonates well with both legislators and the public.

Contention

While there seems to be a strong support for the bill, one area of potential contention could arise from the broader implications of naming rights for public spaces. Critics might argue that this bill could lead to a slippery slope where any deceased individual could be commemorated without standardized criteria. However, as of now, the discussion appears largely in favor of the bill due to its localized and specific nature.