Provides for malfeasance in office relative to traffic cameras for the issuance of citations. (8/1/25) (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
If passed, SB 99 will impact state laws governing traffic enforcement by explicitly stating that the improper use of speed enforcement devices is a serious offense for public officers. This change will add clarity to the existing definitions of malfeasance in office and provide a framework for addressing misconduct in the use of traffic cameras. The law will apply to officers who violate the rules established for using these devices, ensuring accountability among public officials engaged in traffic enforcement.
Senate Bill 99, introduced by Senator Cathey, seeks to amend existing laws regarding malfeasance in office with a specific focus on the misuse of traffic cameras used for issuing citations. The bill clarifies that any unlawful use of handheld, manned, or unmanned automated speed enforcement devices for citation purposes constitutes malfeasance. This legislative proposal aims to address concerns around the potentially improper issuance of traffic citations through automated devices and sets forth penalties for violations in this context.
The sentiment surrounding Bill SB 99 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers focused on accountability in law enforcement practices. Proponents see this as a necessary step to combat potential abuses in the automated traffic enforcement system, which has faced criticism in various jurisdictions. However, sentiments could vary, as concerns may arise about the fairness and effectiveness of automated systems, as well as how these changes could impact drivers and local law enforcement agencies.
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the enforcement mechanisms and the penalties established for violations of the proposed law. There may be discussions around the adequacy of the current regulatory framework in managing traffic citation processes, especially concerning the technology used. Additionally, potential pushback could stem from lawmakers concerned with the implications for local law enforcement, including how these changes might affect their operational autonomy and resource management in traffic enforcement.