Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1376

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a joint interim study regarding the state's response to modifications to federal health care laws.

Impact

The bill mandates a comprehensive review of the state's healthcare framework, focusing on how changes in federal law could affect funding structures such as Medicaid and Medicare. The committee is also charged with identifying necessary changes to state laws and rules to maintain accessibility to federal funding, thus potentially influencing the overall landscape of healthcare policy within Texas. By requiring a report detailing proposed reforms, SB1376 seeks to enhance the state's responsiveness to rapidly evolving federal healthcare regulations.

Summary

SB1376, introduced by Senator Buckingham, proposes the establishment of a joint interim committee tasked with studying Texas's capacity to respond to modifications in federal healthcare laws. This committee aims to analyze the implications of such changes on local governments, health providers, and private organizations. The bill specifies a collaborative approach with relevant state agencies, ensuring that data-driven assessments inform the legislative process and state readiness for adapting to federal reforms.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1376 appears to be constructive, with various stakeholders acknowledging the necessity of preparing for federal changes. Advocates for the bill argue that proactive measures are crucial for safeguarding the interests of Texas residents and health providers as federal policies evolve. The emphasis on collaboration among agencies reflects a bipartisan recognition of the challenges posed by healthcare regulation, although the details of implementation and the specific reforms recommended may stir varied opinions among legislators.

Contention

Potential contentions regarding SB1376 may arise from concerns about the representation of different healthcare stakeholder voices in the joint committee. Critics could argue that there may be an imbalance in perspectives, especially if the committee predominantly features policymakers with certain ideological views on healthcare reform. The effectiveness of the study’s recommendations will depend heavily on accurate assessments of healthcare impacts and stakeholder engagement in the process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits