Relating to requirements for a representative for a student in a special education due process hearing.
Impact
The bill aims to ensure that students have access to qualified advocates who understand the complexities of special education due process. By establishing a framework for who can represent students, SB2141 seeks to enhance the accountability of representatives and ensure they adhere to a code of ethics. Further, the requirement for a written agreement for representation aims to formalize the relationship between the representative and the student, providing an avenue for resolving disputes while maintaining confidentiality.
Summary
Senate Bill 2141 addresses the requirements for a representative for students involved in special education due process hearings. The legislation amends the Education Code to impose specific qualifications on individuals who represent students, particularly prohibiting those with prior employment in the school district they represent from acting as representatives if the district raises an objection. Additionally, the bill mandates that representatives possess knowledge of special education processes and state and federal laws related to special education.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB2141 appears to be largely supportive, as evidenced by its unanimous passage through both the Senate and the House. This consensus suggests that lawmakers recognize the importance of safeguarding student interests in educational disputes and ensuring that representation in due process hearings is conducted by knowledgeable individuals. The legislation is billed as a means of enhancing fairness and transparency in the process, demonstrating a commitment to student rights within special education.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the potential impact of these requirements on the availability of representatives for students. Critics may argue that by imposing strict qualifications, the bill could limit the number of individuals available to advocate for students, particularly in rural or underserved areas. However, the overarching goal is to elevate the standard of representation in special education, aiming to strike a balance between accessible advocacy and quality assurance in these critical proceedings.
Relating to a required training course for persons serving as special education representatives and hearing officers at impartial due process hearings or as facilitators for individualized education program facilitation.
Relating to procedures for the alternative assessment or exemption from assessment of certain public school students who receive special education services and alternative accountability plans for certain campuses serving students who receive special education services.
Relating to a student's eligibility for special education services provided by a school district, including services for dyslexia and related disorders.
Relating to the terminology used to refer to certain disabilities and to an individualized education team for purposes of determining a student's eligibility for special education services and providing those services in public schools.
Relating to a student's eligibility for special education services provided by a school district, including services for dyslexia and related disorders.
Relating to requirements regarding certain behavior management for a student enrolled in a special education program of a public school and related reporting requirements regarding the use of restraint.
Relating to a student's eligibility for special education services provided by a school district, including services for dyslexia and related disorders.