Texas House Bill HB1152

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the deceptive trade practice of charging exorbitant or excessive prices for necessities during a declared disaster.

Impact

The passage of HB 1152 enhances protections for consumers during emergencies, aiming to prevent exploitation that can occur when demand for essential goods surges after a disaster. By legally defining excessive pricing in the context of disasters and expanding existing consumer protection laws, this bill seeks to ensure that residents are not taken advantage of during vulnerable times. This legislation serves as a deterrent against price gouging by establishing clear legal standards that can be enforced against businesses engaging in such practices.

Summary

House Bill 1152 addresses the deceptive trade practice of charging excessively high prices for essential goods during declared disasters. Specifically, it amends the Business & Commerce Code to clarify and expand definitions of what constitutes 'building materials' and other necessities, thereby making it illegal to sell or lease such items at exorbitant prices during a 'designated disaster period.' The bill defines this period as starting from the date of a disaster declaration and ending 30 days after its termination, providing a clear timeframe for enforcement.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1152 appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups and the public, as it aligns with a broader interest in fair pricing and protection during emergencies. Advocates argue that the bill reinforces ethical business practices and public trust in market regulation during crises. However, there may be some opposition from segments of the business community concerned about how such measures could impact their operational flexibility in response to fluctuating demand during disasters.

Contention

Notable points of contention during the discussions around HB 1152 included concerns from business owners regarding the implications of strict regulations on pricing practices, especially for those who might face increased costs for goods during emergencies. Critics argued that the definitions of 'exorbitant pricing' could be subjective and potentially stifle innovation or responsiveness in the market. Supporters counter that such regulations are essential for protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring that essential services remain accessible during a disaster.